Developer Tools

Is Google Firebase Worth The Hype?

Google's Firebase Studio vs. The AI Coding World: A Comedy of Errors

May 20, 2025

So I just spent an afternoon wrestling with Google's shiny new Firebase Studio, their entry into the increasingly crowded "AI will code everything for you" arena.

Spoiler alert: I'm not throwing away my programmer socks just yet.

The Context

If you caught my previous deep dive (link in video description), you'll know I've been systematically torturing the top five AI coding tools by making them build a CRM system.

It's been my weird little benchmark test to see if this whole "vibe coding" revolution is actually delivering on its promises.

When Google dropped Firebase Studio with the usual fanfare that accompanies anything Google launches ("It will revolutionize everything!"), I couldn't resist putting it through the same gauntlet.

After all, this is Google we're talking about…

…vertical integration with Gemini, Firebase infrastructure, and enough computing power to simulate small universes.

Surely they'd crush the competition, right?

If you're a "I'm only able to pay attention to videos" type-of-person, here's my full video review. Voila!

The Experience: Documentation? What Documentation?

My testing methodology is straightforward: feed the AI tools three critical documents: a Product Requirements Document, user stories, and technical setup specs - then see how well they can interpret and build from them. It's like giving an architecture student blueprints and seeing if they build you a house or a birdhouse.

Firebase Studio apparently missed this memo entirely. Seriously.

From the start, the tool seemed determined to build what IT wanted rather than what I wanted. Uploading my documentation became a bizarre adventure in itself. Unlike other platforms where you can simply upload files, I had to resort to creating manual markdown files and copy-pasting content - a workaround that would make any UX designer wince.

The conversation basically went like this:

Me: "Here's my comprehensive documentation for a CRM."
Firebase Studio: "I see you want to build an app that lets users upload PRDs!"
Me: "No, no. USE these PRDs to build a CRM."
Firebase Studio: "Got it! A gap analyzer for PRDs!"
Me: facepalm

What I Actually Got

After much digital arm-wrestling, Firebase Studio finally coughed up something called "Contact Keeper" - the AI equivalent of a "Hello World" program when I asked for an enterprise CRM solution. It had a basic contact list and details page with a mysterious "tax suggestions" feature that returned errors when clicked.

The essential CRM components? Nowhere to be found.

No Kanban boards for visualizing deals.

No sales funnel view showing prospect stages.

No dashboards, no reporting, no... well, you get the idea.

It was like asking for a Swiss Army knife and getting a plastic fork…

The Competition Still Sleeps Well at Night

Let's put this in perspective: tools like Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Tempo, and v0 (the contenders from my previous video and article) may not be perfect, but they at least understood the assignment. They parsed documentation, asked clarifying questions, and produced reasonable approximations of what I requested.

Here's how the Big 5 of Vibe Coding performed when I tried to build a simple CRM app:

Firebase Studio, despite having the might of Google behind it, delivered something so basic that it wouldn't even qualify as a minimum viable product in most startup ecosystems.

It's especially puzzling given Google's resources and their supposed AI prowess with Gemini and backend capabilities of Firebase.

The Verdict: Not Ready for Prime Time

Is Firebase Studio the AI coding apocalypse that YouTube thumbnails are screaming about? Based on my testing: absolutely not1. At least not in its current form.

Could it improve? Of course. Google has the technical chops and resources to iterate quickly. But right now, there's a substantial gap between what Google has released and what the current market leaders offer.

For developers looking at these tools, the message is clear: don't believe the hype cycle without testing. The AI coding revolution is happening, but it's happening in fits and starts, with plenty of overpromising and underdelivering along the way.

Has anyone else tried Firebase Studio? Did you have better luck than I did? Drop your experiences in the comments - I'm genuinely curious if I've missed some magical prompt that turns this tool into the coding wizard Google suggests it is.

Until next time, keep coding. Whether by hand or by prompt!

So I just spent an afternoon wrestling with Google's shiny new Firebase Studio, their entry into the increasingly crowded "AI will code everything for you" arena.

Spoiler alert: I'm not throwing away my programmer socks just yet.

The Context

If you caught my previous deep dive (link in video description), you'll know I've been systematically torturing the top five AI coding tools by making them build a CRM system.

It's been my weird little benchmark test to see if this whole "vibe coding" revolution is actually delivering on its promises.

When Google dropped Firebase Studio with the usual fanfare that accompanies anything Google launches ("It will revolutionize everything!"), I couldn't resist putting it through the same gauntlet.

After all, this is Google we're talking about…

…vertical integration with Gemini, Firebase infrastructure, and enough computing power to simulate small universes.

Surely they'd crush the competition, right?

If you're a "I'm only able to pay attention to videos" type-of-person, here's my full video review. Voila!

The Experience: Documentation? What Documentation?

My testing methodology is straightforward: feed the AI tools three critical documents: a Product Requirements Document, user stories, and technical setup specs - then see how well they can interpret and build from them. It's like giving an architecture student blueprints and seeing if they build you a house or a birdhouse.

Firebase Studio apparently missed this memo entirely. Seriously.

From the start, the tool seemed determined to build what IT wanted rather than what I wanted. Uploading my documentation became a bizarre adventure in itself. Unlike other platforms where you can simply upload files, I had to resort to creating manual markdown files and copy-pasting content - a workaround that would make any UX designer wince.

The conversation basically went like this:

Me: "Here's my comprehensive documentation for a CRM."
Firebase Studio: "I see you want to build an app that lets users upload PRDs!"
Me: "No, no. USE these PRDs to build a CRM."
Firebase Studio: "Got it! A gap analyzer for PRDs!"
Me: facepalm

What I Actually Got

After much digital arm-wrestling, Firebase Studio finally coughed up something called "Contact Keeper" - the AI equivalent of a "Hello World" program when I asked for an enterprise CRM solution. It had a basic contact list and details page with a mysterious "tax suggestions" feature that returned errors when clicked.

The essential CRM components? Nowhere to be found.

No Kanban boards for visualizing deals.

No sales funnel view showing prospect stages.

No dashboards, no reporting, no... well, you get the idea.

It was like asking for a Swiss Army knife and getting a plastic fork…

The Competition Still Sleeps Well at Night

Let's put this in perspective: tools like Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Tempo, and v0 (the contenders from my previous video and article) may not be perfect, but they at least understood the assignment. They parsed documentation, asked clarifying questions, and produced reasonable approximations of what I requested.

Here's how the Big 5 of Vibe Coding performed when I tried to build a simple CRM app:

Firebase Studio, despite having the might of Google behind it, delivered something so basic that it wouldn't even qualify as a minimum viable product in most startup ecosystems.

It's especially puzzling given Google's resources and their supposed AI prowess with Gemini and backend capabilities of Firebase.

The Verdict: Not Ready for Prime Time

Is Firebase Studio the AI coding apocalypse that YouTube thumbnails are screaming about? Based on my testing: absolutely not1. At least not in its current form.

Could it improve? Of course. Google has the technical chops and resources to iterate quickly. But right now, there's a substantial gap between what Google has released and what the current market leaders offer.

For developers looking at these tools, the message is clear: don't believe the hype cycle without testing. The AI coding revolution is happening, but it's happening in fits and starts, with plenty of overpromising and underdelivering along the way.

Has anyone else tried Firebase Studio? Did you have better luck than I did? Drop your experiences in the comments - I'm genuinely curious if I've missed some magical prompt that turns this tool into the coding wizard Google suggests it is.

Until next time, keep coding. Whether by hand or by prompt!

So I just spent an afternoon wrestling with Google's shiny new Firebase Studio, their entry into the increasingly crowded "AI will code everything for you" arena.

Spoiler alert: I'm not throwing away my programmer socks just yet.

The Context

If you caught my previous deep dive (link in video description), you'll know I've been systematically torturing the top five AI coding tools by making them build a CRM system.

It's been my weird little benchmark test to see if this whole "vibe coding" revolution is actually delivering on its promises.

When Google dropped Firebase Studio with the usual fanfare that accompanies anything Google launches ("It will revolutionize everything!"), I couldn't resist putting it through the same gauntlet.

After all, this is Google we're talking about…

…vertical integration with Gemini, Firebase infrastructure, and enough computing power to simulate small universes.

Surely they'd crush the competition, right?

If you're a "I'm only able to pay attention to videos" type-of-person, here's my full video review. Voila!

The Experience: Documentation? What Documentation?

My testing methodology is straightforward: feed the AI tools three critical documents: a Product Requirements Document, user stories, and technical setup specs - then see how well they can interpret and build from them. It's like giving an architecture student blueprints and seeing if they build you a house or a birdhouse.

Firebase Studio apparently missed this memo entirely. Seriously.

From the start, the tool seemed determined to build what IT wanted rather than what I wanted. Uploading my documentation became a bizarre adventure in itself. Unlike other platforms where you can simply upload files, I had to resort to creating manual markdown files and copy-pasting content - a workaround that would make any UX designer wince.

The conversation basically went like this:

Me: "Here's my comprehensive documentation for a CRM."
Firebase Studio: "I see you want to build an app that lets users upload PRDs!"
Me: "No, no. USE these PRDs to build a CRM."
Firebase Studio: "Got it! A gap analyzer for PRDs!"
Me: facepalm

What I Actually Got

After much digital arm-wrestling, Firebase Studio finally coughed up something called "Contact Keeper" - the AI equivalent of a "Hello World" program when I asked for an enterprise CRM solution. It had a basic contact list and details page with a mysterious "tax suggestions" feature that returned errors when clicked.

The essential CRM components? Nowhere to be found.

No Kanban boards for visualizing deals.

No sales funnel view showing prospect stages.

No dashboards, no reporting, no... well, you get the idea.

It was like asking for a Swiss Army knife and getting a plastic fork…

The Competition Still Sleeps Well at Night

Let's put this in perspective: tools like Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Tempo, and v0 (the contenders from my previous video and article) may not be perfect, but they at least understood the assignment. They parsed documentation, asked clarifying questions, and produced reasonable approximations of what I requested.

Here's how the Big 5 of Vibe Coding performed when I tried to build a simple CRM app:

Firebase Studio, despite having the might of Google behind it, delivered something so basic that it wouldn't even qualify as a minimum viable product in most startup ecosystems.

It's especially puzzling given Google's resources and their supposed AI prowess with Gemini and backend capabilities of Firebase.

The Verdict: Not Ready for Prime Time

Is Firebase Studio the AI coding apocalypse that YouTube thumbnails are screaming about? Based on my testing: absolutely not1. At least not in its current form.

Could it improve? Of course. Google has the technical chops and resources to iterate quickly. But right now, there's a substantial gap between what Google has released and what the current market leaders offer.

For developers looking at these tools, the message is clear: don't believe the hype cycle without testing. The AI coding revolution is happening, but it's happening in fits and starts, with plenty of overpromising and underdelivering along the way.

Has anyone else tried Firebase Studio? Did you have better luck than I did? Drop your experiences in the comments - I'm genuinely curious if I've missed some magical prompt that turns this tool into the coding wizard Google suggests it is.

Until next time, keep coding. Whether by hand or by prompt!

Get free SaaS Black Friday updates

Join the 2025 Waitlist

40+ Exclusive Brands

Unmissable Free Updates